Published: 26 August 2016
Author(s): F.R. Rosendaal
Issue: August 2016
Section: Review Article

It is remarkable that in the interpretation of scientific evidence, be it as reviewer for a medical journal or as reader, clinicians appear to be the ones most impressed by p-values and statistical significance, or the absence thereof. They attach in their reviews and presentations more importance to it than epidemiologists and statisticians. In fact, the latter groups often actively discourage the use, and certainly the overinterpretation of significance testing, as reflected also in reporting guidelines such as STROBE, which see the presentation of p-values in a scientific article as an option, not an obligation.


Stay informed on our latest news!


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.